Imperial Prostate 7 - Prostate Assessment using Comparative Interventions – Fast mri and Image-fusion for Cancer

Study ID: 52871
Short Title: IP7-PACIFIC
Trust Name: UHS
Recruitment Site: Southampton General Hospital
Disease Area: Urology
Phase: N/A
Expected End Date: 01/02/2026
Postcode: SO16 6YD
Contact Name: Amanda Pattie
Contact Email: studysupport1and3.crnwessex@nihr.ac.uk
Active: Yes

Inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and study summary

Summary: Patients with a prostate (either cis-male gender or trans-female gender with no prior androgen deprivation hormone use at all) referred to hospital urology departments by their GP due to a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated serum prostate specific antigen [PSA], abnormal feeling prostate on rectal examination). These patients are normally recommended to undergo a prostate MRI as part of standard care. Randomisation-1: bpMRI versus mpMRI Patients with elevated age-specific PSA or abnormal digital rectal examination of the prostate with PSA levels as determined by NICE guidance and local NHS Cancer Alliance or regional guidance. Recent UK consensus guidance [Prostate Cancer UK, 2016] from over 300 UK healthcare professionals and men affected by prostate cancer and endorsed by the British Association of Urological Nurses (BAUN), the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) and the Primary Care Urology Society (PCUS) also stipulates that patients with a family history (1 or more first degree male relatives) or ethnic risk group (those identifying as of Black-African/Black-Caribbean) should be further investigated with PSA >/= 2.5 when aged 45-49 years. We will also approach these patients as well. Randomisation-2: Visual registration targeting versus image fusion targeting Suspicious finding on mpMRI or bpMRI from randomisation-1 requiring targeted biopsy (MRI categories 3, 4 or 5)

Randomisation-1: bpMRI versus mpMRI - PSA > 50ng/ml. The rationale being that above this PSA level, rates of clinically important PCa are quite high and a pre-biopsy MRI is likely to be of less utility. - Prostate MRI or prostate biopsy within the previous 24 months from the date of screening. A prior prostate MRI which is negative will add selection bias and a prior biopsy can cause artefact changes which affect the quality of the images. These artefact changes can take a number of months to dissipate and in some patients up to 9-12 months after the biopsy. - Prior prostate cancer diagnosis at any time-point. Patients on active surveillance will have differing prior probabilities of clinically important cancer to those referred with a clinical suspicion and are therefore excluded. - Any absolute contraindication to MRI, gadolinium contrast or biopsy. Patients with one or two hip prostheses are excluded. These prostheses often cast a large imaging artefact over the prostate area on MRI and radiologists prefer a mpMRI scan because the diffusion images can be particularly affected. - Unable to give informed consent to the study Randomisation-2: Visual registration targeting versus image fusion targeting - As above for randomisation 1 - Patient refusal for biopsy

Every year, 150,000 patients at risk of prostate cancer (PCa) are referred to hospital. Guidelines have recently recommended patients have a multi-parametric MRI (mMRI) before biopsy so those with a negative mpMRI can avoid an invasive biopsy. This is because a negative mpMRI means there is a low chance of there being important prostate cancer. In patients with a suspicious mpMRI, targeted biopsies improve detection of important PCa. We want to further improve this new pathway. First, mpMRI takes 40-minutes due to injection of a dye called gadolinium. This requires medical supervision due to risk of allergic reactions. Many hospitals do not have enough scanner time or expert radiologists to look at all the images. A 15-minute biparametric MRI (bpMRI), without gadolinium, which is less costly might be as accurate as mpMRI. Second, once a patient needs a biopsy the doctor has to estimate where to target the biopsy needle using live ultrasound. This so-called visual-registration targeting requires expertise which is not readily available everywhere. New image-fusion technology overlays MR images onto ultrasound images to guide the biopsy needle better. We want to test if a bpMRI, compared to mpMRI, is as accurate in diagnosing important PCa. We also want to test whether image-fusion is better than visual-registration biopsies. We want to answer both questions in one trial. Patients who need a prostate MRI and agree to participate will first be randomised to mpMRI or bpMRI. If the mpMRI or bpMRI is suspicious, patients will then be randomised to visual-registration or image-fusion targeted biopsy. We will look at the number of patients biopsied, and the numbers diagnosed with important and unimportant PCa. We also want to assess value for money in the NHS.

Study MapList of studies

Accessibility tools

Return to header